3 Feb
2019
3 Feb
'19
2:47 a.m.
On 01/31/2019 11:11 PM, holger krekel wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 23:24 +0100, Marco Vittorini
Orgeas wrote:
I didn't want to be extreme: let's say user@domain1 is happily exchanging
mails with user@domain2, then user@domain1 starts to use delta to reply to
user@domain2, over-taking ownership of future communications with
user@domain2.
What happens if user@domain1 want to continue using its MUAs to
communicate with user@domain2 ?
I see quite a big problem here.
On 01/30/2019 08:54 AM, holger krekel wrote:
This sounds like a bit of an extreme statement that disregards that
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 23:08 +0100, Eduard
Zeiger wrote:
Which causes a big scope issue
<https://lists.codespeak.net/hyperkitty/list/delta@codespeak.net/thread/TAQGFUOGXWPNR7UV6ETEUYKDX6UKXZJO/>
because you end building a MUA which can be used only with a dedicated
account, unless you replicate the main features of e.g.: Mozilla
Thunderbird. Hi,
that is the answer! Thank you very much!
I have no problem with a dedicated account - but please with an another app - maybe
Gamma-Chat or so.
If a dedicated account guaranteed, that i can communicate with all EMails, that is OK
<<"for me">> too.
DeltaChat will surely remain able to
communicate with arbitrary e-mail addresses,
whether they use delta or not a lot of people seem to be able to use DeltaChat quite
successfully,
including messaging with non-delta chat addresses.
Betcha those are all using a
dedicated account ;)
--
Marco